Three Jurors in Clancy Trial Describe Frustration With Holdout (Gift Article)
The three jurors, who voted to acquit Lindsay Clancy of murder, described the tense deliberations in an interview with a Boston TV station.
Gift Links
Shared By
People were giving Reddington a hard time for moving for the holdout juror to be dismissed. But the juror admitted he had reasonable doubt and still refused to acquit. Could it have been a reasonable move on Reddington's part to try to get him tossed?
The fact that any newspaper or broadcast news producer would devote space to stories like this is clear evidence of their lack of seriousness.
...that's literally how the system is supposed to work. why is this written as though it's some kind of scandal? www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/u...
All the press re Lindsay Clancy's jury is RIDICULOUS. U.S. jury trials ALWAYS hold the potential of a hung jury. The prosecution can retry such cases. Many defendants are found guilty when retried. "Three Jurors in Clancy Trial Describe Frustration With Holdout." www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/u...
www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/u...
www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/u...
One of the three jurors interviewed, Kellie Farina...told NBC10 Boston that the holdout juror “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.” www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/u... I guess there's that. Interesting that 11 could.
www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/u...
Three Jurors in Clancy Trial Describe Frustration With Holdout www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/u...
If you strangle your children to death you are insane. Knowing this does not take years of analysis or twelve ordinary people to agree.
www.nytimes.com/2026/09/08/u... The case has deeply divided Americans, with some supporting the prosecution and others — especially women who report negative experiences with the postpartum mental health care system — expressing sympathy for Ms. Clancy.