Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious (Gift Article)

No obvious legal authority supports a pre-emptive effort to block the certification of Alaska’s Senate election if the Republican incumbent narrowly loses. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

This is as close as the NYT comes to saying what Trump’s DOJ is doing is total bullshit. (They shoukd get closer.) www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

“Election law specialists said the litigation lacked any legitimate legal basis.” This is the understatement of the year. It’s a sanctionable filing LOL. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

What feeble, scaredy-cat BS from the #BrokenTimes. It doesn't take a "legal expert" to know this election interference is more than merely "dubious." Democracy dies, its guardian shrugs. Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

“The lawsuit seems too late — the ballot is already finalized. It also seems premature — the election has not happened yet. Either way, election law specialists said, its legal basis is so thin that it appeared to be more about messaging.” www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

It’s also like whoever wrote this sentence — “It is by no means certain that any of these legal actions will ultimately succeed” — didn’t read this article: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/us/alaska-senate-doj-lawsuit-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LFE.ZjiG.SFOvl6wsEG84&smid=url-share

For context: www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

The Federal law that Blanche refers to is the NVRA which has nothing to do with the Alaska situation www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

The Justice Department suddenly finds 'no obvious legal authority' for election interference, unless it's to pre-emptively save a losing Republican incumbent, of course.

Democrats, be afraid of no one!!!!! They want us to be afraid. Not today SATAN!!!!! Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious No obvious legal authority supports a pre-emptive effort to block the certification of Alaska’s Senate election if the Republican incumbent narrowly loses. 2/2

The real story is Trump is starting, ahead of schedule, telegraphing that's he's challenging results by any means necessary. This case just happens to be stupid, but this is about flooding the zone, as Bannon says. Governors, AGs, the ball will be in your court. 🎁 www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious No obvious legal authority supports a pre-emptive effort to block the certification of Alaska’s Senate election if the Republican incumbent narrowly loses. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious. No obvious legal authority supports a pre-emptive effort to block the certification of Alaska’s Senate election if the Republican incumbent narrowly loses. You can read it for free. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

“It is one of the weakest election lawsuits I’ve ever seen. It should have no realistic chance of success in the courts.” www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

We, the tax payers, fund these bogus lawsuits. “It is one of the weakest election lawsuits I’ve ever seen,” said Richard H. Pildes, a New York University law professor who specializes in election issues. “It should have no realistic chance of success in the courts." www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious (Gift Article) f the nyt

www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

DOJ lacks constitutional and statutory standing to block Alaska's election certification, legal experts say. By weaponizing a vague preamble to file a zombie lawsuit, the administration substitutes political messaging for legitimate legal jurisdiction. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u... #GiftArticle

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u... Interference again

Trump's DOJ had to sue to halt Alaska's certification if INCUMBENT Dan Sullivan loses because 1.) "Incumbent" has three syllables; 2.) Parentheticals could be misunderstood as mirror images of an emoji smile; and 3.) He fears his voters are fucking stupid. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

“It’s the worst complaint I’ve ever seen,” said Richard L. Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, who specializes in election issues. “No federal statute gives D.O.J. the right to sue over these things. The Constitution doesn’t give it standing, either.”

Explore this gift article from The New York Times. You can read it for free without a subscription. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u... if Senator Sullivan loses narrowly — except even then, he said, such a challenge would be for the senator to bring in state court, not for the Justice Department to bring in federal court.

The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit pre-emptively challenging the certification of #Alaska’s Senate election if the GOP candidate narrowly loses. 🔸What is the lawsuit about? Designed to create voter confusion. 🔸Does the DOJ have legal standing? None that is obvious... By Charlie Savage

#Gift There is nothing legal about Trump's plan to force #Alaska to keep Sullivan even if he loses the election. This is an #illegal attempt from his #autocracy. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Pulitzer headline committee has flagged this winner from NYT Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious World’s most creative use of the word “dubious” www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Hope this analysis is accurate Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

AK lawsuit is not at all serious “ worst complaint I’ve ever seen” “ one of the weakest election lawsuits” Why do it then? “It’s a press-release litigation” DOJ just gives Trump something more for grievancemaxxing www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

"The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit pre-emptively challenging the certification of Alaska’s Senate election if the Republican candidate narrowly loses. But election law specialists said the litigation lacked any legitimate legal basis." www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Legal Experts See Trump’s DOJ’s Alaska Election Challenge as Stupid. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u... Of course it's f***ing "dubious," but do you really think the Supreme Court won't get involved and give Trump the verdict he wants?

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Ya think? www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

This action from the "justice department" is bullshit.

www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.'s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious (Charlie Savage/New York Times) Main Link | memeorandum Permalink

后续法律分析：《纽约时报》引述法学家称，司法部援引的是《国家选民登记法》序言中的选举诚信表述，序言本身不产生独立法律效力，该法也不处理此类候选资格与认证争议。司法部要求调查同名候选人的票原想投给谁，仍是诉讼请求，法院尚未批准阻止认证。 https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/us/alaska-senate-doj-lawsuit-trump.html

Aside from these arguments, can there exist a judge with such a tenuous grasp of logic to not see the same argument could be used by Democrats if Sullivan wins? They could claim people voted for the wrong Sullivan to give him enough votes to prevail over Peltola  www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u... “It is one of the weakest election lawsuits I’ve ever seen,” said Richard H. Pildes, a New York University law professor who specializes in election issues. The Con in Chief attempts to steal an election that's not even official yet.

www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Charles Savage, like all NYT reporters, ignores the elephant in the room: the MAGA hacks on the Supreme Court who will do almost anything to boost their party’s chance of success. Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

No obvious legal authority supports a pre-emptive effort to block the certification of Alaska’s Senate election if the Republican incumbent narrowly loses. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Thought you all might want to read this. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Stanley Woodward put his name on this meritless suit. That’s a Rule 11 violation. Specifically, Rule 11(b)(1): Improper purpose Time for consequences. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

#Alaska #election #Justice #Senate 🌐 www.newsmart.ch

Yep, clearly a press release legal filing. It’s another example of the evil and vile steps the Republican Party is taking to subvert our right to vote. They are a truly disgusting political organization…and will be the death of America if they aren’t stopped. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Here it is. The Felon's continuation in making the United States an authoritarian theocracy, with the Felon as leader and the American oligarchs running the Country (Putin's Russia). www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Let the MAGA shenanigans begin. Why can't the Republicans accept the results of elections? www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Answer: because for some reason they’ve never heard of Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas

Is this insane or what? Todd Blanche & Trump are messing with the Alaskan election for no gd or legal reason & have no right to do so! They have invented an excuse that is irrelevant & unfair. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u...

Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious Why Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/us/alaska-senate-doj-lawsuit-trump.html?smid=nytcore-android-share